Approach Experience Foundation Connect

Learning & Workforce Readiness Leader

Mike
Chandler

Learning systems for complex organizations · Greater Boston

I build learning systems for complex organizations where clarity, consistency, and readiness matter. My work spans military operations, higher education, financial services, government, and healthcare, with a consistent focus on helping people perform well when the work matters.

ATD Member SHRM-SCP CPTD Crucial Conversations

Capability

Workforce readiness

Learning tied to the decisions, handoffs, conversations, and standards that shape performance.

Method

Design through implementation

Strategy, stakeholder alignment, content design, launch support, and sustainment connected as one system.

Range

Five operating environments

Military, higher education, financial services, government, and healthcare experience without losing discipline.

Core belief Learning is strongest when it changes what people are prepared to do, not just what they have been told.

Mike Chandler, learning and workforce readiness leader

Core Belief

"Learning should make the work clearer, the standard stronger, and the person more ready for the moment in front of them."

Operating Style

How I approach the work
with structure, judgment, and care.

My approach is to start with the work itself, understand the environment, and build learning that can be reinforced, measured, maintained, and improved over time.

I try to keep strategy close to execution. A strong plan should still make sense to the people responsible for carrying it forward.

01

Start with the real work

I look for the decisions, handoffs, conversations, and standards that shape performance before designing a learning solution.

Performance analysis

02

Respect the environment

I try to understand the culture, constraints, pace, and stakeholder realities of an organization before prescribing a path forward.

Stakeholder alignment

03

Connect design to implementation

I focus on the full learning system: design, launch, reinforcement, manager support, measurement, and sustainment.

Transfer of learning

04

Build for sustainment

I design learning so it can be owned, repeated, improved, and governed after the first delivery moment has passed.

Learning governance

Portfolio Guide

Use the sectors as a guided scan.

Each sector highlights a different environment and capability. Open artifacts for samples; scan case examples for the leadership pattern behind the work.

ArtifactOpenable sampleCaseSummarized workPrincipleReusable approach
Explore the work by sector Choose a sector to review examples and evidence.

Sector 01 · Military

Where performance standards
become the design standard.

Military training shaped how I think about readiness: define the standard, practice the real work, verify performance, and support people when the work becomes real.

This section demonstrates

Workforce readinessPerformance verificationTransfer of learningOperational discipline
Sector 1 of 5Artifact + Operating Principle

Military · Performance Readiness

Viewable Artifact

Performance Readiness Model

+

Context

My early Army experience taught me that training has to prepare people for the moment work becomes real, not just the moment instruction ends.

My role

I supported training environments where standards, coaching, feedback, and performance verification were part of everyday readiness.

What I built or shaped

I translated that lesson into a readiness model focused on purpose, role clarity, practice, support, leader reinforcement, and feedback after launch.

What it demonstrates

A practical way to connect learning design to decisions, conversations, systems, escalation paths, and real performance.

Capabilities Workforce readinessPerformance verificationTransfer of learningLeader reinforcement

Open the PDF to inspect the selected framework or model.

Artifact: Performance Readiness Model

PDF

Performance Readiness Model

Military · Workforce readiness · Performance standards

A concise two-page model translating an early military lesson into a practical framework for preparing people to perform when the work becomes real.

What this proves: I can translate a formative readiness lesson into a simple learning model that applies beyond its original environment.

View PDF

Sector 02 · Higher Education

Development in expert cultures
where mandates alone do not work.

My higher education work includes five years at Southern New Hampshire University, six years at the University of New Hampshire, and graduate-level teaching in mathematics, statistics, and calculus. That experience shaped how I support expert learners with respect, clarity, and practical structure.

This section demonstrates

Adult learningExpert adoptionFaculty developmentMeasurement and calibration

11+

Years in higher education

5

Years · SNHU

6

Years · UNH

Math

Graduate stats & calculus

Sector 2 of 5Case Examples + Model

Higher Education · Faculty & Staff Development

Case Example

Building Development People Choose to Use

+

Context

Higher education depends on expert learners with deep content knowledge and limited patience for generic training.

My role

I designed and supported faculty and staff development, informed by graduate-level teaching in mathematics, statistics, and calculus.

What I built or shaped

I built facilitator resources and development structures that turned instructional expectations into practical teaching support.

What it demonstrates

Adult learning judgment, facilitation design, peer development, and credibility in expert cultures.

Capabilities Adult learningFaculty developmentFacilitationExpert adoption
Capabilities Data-Informed DesignI built survey instruments that surfaced real adoption barriers before they became systemic, then used the data to prioritize support resources. Curriculum DevelopmentI designed faculty development curriculum connected to what faculty actually cared about, not only what administrators assumed they needed. Stakeholder AlignmentI worked to earn trust in a culture that often resists top-down development by designing experiences worth choosing and building collaboratively with Deans.

Context

In large-scale online learning, grading consistency affects fairness, learner trust, and academic quality.

My role

I supported a norming approach that helped faculty calibrate expectations and discuss scoring differences.

What I built or shaped

I shaped a five-phase process for rubric interpretation, independent scoring, calibration discussion, repeat scoring, and reliability review.

What it demonstrates

Measurement thinking, instructional quality, fairness, and learning design that improves consistency at scale.

Capabilities MeasurementInter-rater reliabilityRubric alignmentOnline learning at scale

Review the on-page model below.

Faculty Norming Process - Five-Phase Architecture

Phase 01

Preliminary Scoring

Each faculty member scores sample student work independently against the rubric - no discussion, no anchors. This establishes the baseline divergence.

Phase 02

Statistical Analysis

Fleiss' Kappa calculated across the cohort. Scores mapped by rubric criterion to identify exactly where divergence is highest - which criteria need the most calibration work.

Phase 03

Calibration

Cohort works through high-divergence criteria together. Faculty share rationale for scoring decisions. Anchor examples established. Shared interpretation built - not imposed.

Phase 04

Final Scoring

Faculty score a new sample independently post-calibration. No collaboration during scoring. Results reflect what calibration actually changed - not what faculty agreed to in discussion.

Phase 05

Post-Kappa Analysis

Fleiss' Kappa recalculated. Pre/post comparison demonstrates the statistical effect of calibration. Movement to κ ≥ 0.70 confirms acceptable inter-rater reliability achieved.

Statistical Standard

Fleiss' Kappa

Inter-rater reliability measure for 3+ raters scoring the same subjects. Corrects for chance agreement.

Acceptable Threshold

κ ≥ 0.70

Minimum acceptable inter-rater agreement. Below this, rubric scoring cannot be considered reliable across faculty.

Strong Agreement

κ ≥ 0.80

Target threshold for high-stakes rubric scoring. Demonstrates calibration has created genuine shared understanding - not surface compliance.

At a university with 8,042 online faculty grading student work across thousands of courses simultaneously, even modest movement in reliability can materially affect fairness. That was the scale and responsibility behind the work.

Evidence focus: the model was designed to compare pre- and post-calibration reliability so academic leaders could see whether the intervention improved shared grading judgment.

Evidence-Based

Sector 03 · Financial Services

Learning infrastructure for
growth, trust, and operational consistency.

In financial services, learning has to support trust, manager consistency, regulatory awareness, and practical execution. My work has centered on capability systems that help leaders and employees act with more clarity and confidence.

This section demonstrates

Manager capabilityCareer architectureChange readinessStakeholder alignment
Regulated service environment Branch, operations, and leadership audiences Manager capability and career growth
Sector 3 of 5Artifact + Case Examples

Financial Services · Manager Capability

Case Example

Building Manager Capability Around the Moments That Matter

+

Context

Managers shape employee confidence, member experience, and operational consistency through everyday decisions and follow-through.

My role

I translated broad leadership expectations into practical manager behaviors, routines, and reinforcement points.

What I built or shaped

I shaped manager development around role clarity, delegation, accountability, communication, coaching, and operating rhythms.

What it demonstrates

Capability building, manager enablement, behavior change, and the link between learning and execution.

Capabilities Manager capabilityBehavior changeCoachingOperational consistency

Context

Growth requires a clearer view of the skills roles need today and the capabilities teams will need next.

My role

I introduced a succession readiness framework to make talent conversations more specific, practical, and repeatable.

What I built or shaped

I built a five-step model for critical roles, capability definition, readiness calibration, development planning, and review rhythm.

What it demonstrates

Succession readiness, leadership capability building, manager enablement, and evidence-informed structure for workforce planning.

Capabilities Succession readinessLeadership capabilityDevelopment planningTalent strategy

Open the PDF to inspect the selected framework or model.

Artifact: Leadership Capability & Succession Readiness Framework

PDF

Leadership Capability & Succession Readiness Framework

Financial Services · Leadership capability · Succession readiness

A practical framework for identifying critical roles, defining leadership capabilities, calibrating readiness, building development plans, and reviewing succession health over time.

What this proves: I can turn succession planning into a practical, leader-owned capability system.

View PDF

Context

Financial services change often affects employees, members, systems, compliance expectations, and service experience at the same time.

My role

I clarified what people needed to know, do, decide, escalate, and reinforce as changes moved toward implementation.

What I built or shaped

I built enablement structures, job aids, readiness plans, and stakeholder guidance to support adoption.

What it demonstrates

Change readiness, stakeholder alignment, transfer of learning, and practical execution support.

Capabilities Change readinessEnablementStakeholder alignmentSustainment

Sector 04 · Government

Scaling learning across
public systems, policy, and human impact.

Government learning work requires clarity, consistency, and respect for distributed teams, policy constraints, and public service outcomes. I focus on systems that help people adopt new tools and practices while keeping the human purpose visible.

This section demonstrates

Distributed adoptionChampion enablementPublic accountabilitySustainable implementation
Statewide public service environment Distributed teams and regional offices Union-aware and compliance-sensitive work
Sector 4 of 5Viewable Artifact + Case Examples

Government · Learning Infrastructure

Case Example

Building Consistency Across a Distributed Public Workforce

+

Context

Public sector learning has to reach distributed teams while maintaining consistency, policy alignment, and service quality.

My role

I supported learning infrastructure that made expectations, resources, and support pathways clearer across a statewide environment.

What I built or shaped

I shaped resources and rollout approaches that translated central guidance into practical tools for field teams.

What it demonstrates

Scalable learning design, operational clarity, public accountability, and distributed adoption support.

Capabilities Scalable learningPublic sector operationsRole clarityConsistency

Context

A statewide Hub rollout needed trained champions to support local adoption and escalate issues consistently across regional teams.

My role

I supported the learning and change approach by clarifying the rollout story, champion role, training sequence, escalation paths, and success measures.

What I built or shaped

I shaped a practical deck that made the rollout, role expectations, escalation scenarios, and leadership actions easier to use.

What it demonstrates

Champion enablement, support model design, training sequencing, stakeholder communication, and adoption planning.

This viewable sample shows how the champion approach was translated into a clear leadership-facing rollout deck.

Artifact: Hub Champion Rollout & Escalation Approach

PDF

Hub Champion Rollout & Escalation Approach

Government · DDS Hub · Champion enablement

A sample slide deck overview showing rollout rationale, training scope, champion role clarity, escalation scenarios, support model design, success measures, and leadership actions.

What this proves: I can turn system rollout complexity into practical champion roles, escalation pathways, training sequencing, leader actions, and adoption support.

View PDF
Capabilities Champion enablementEscalation designTraining sequencingAdoption support

Context

Government systems work affects employees and the people they serve. Training has to support accuracy without losing purpose.

My role

I kept operational requirements connected to service quality, staff confidence, and practical usability.

What I built or shaped

I helped translate complex processes into clearer guidance, learning resources, and support structures.

What it demonstrates

Systems thinking, empathy, public trust, and making complex work easier to use.

Capabilities Human impactSystems thinkingPublic trustPractical usability

Sector 05 · Healthcare

Workforce readiness where
precision, trust, and compliance matter.

Healthcare learning sits at the intersection of clinical excellence, research rigor, compliance, employee experience, and operational change. I focus on readiness structures that hold up in specialized, high-expectation environments.

This section demonstrates

Compliance readinessWorkday LearningGovernanceMission-driven operations
Cancer research and treatment environment Compliance-sensitive learning ecosystem Clinical, research, and administrative audiences
Sector 5 of 5Viewable Artifact + Case Examples

Healthcare · Workday Learning Compliance Readiness

Viewable Artifact

Operationalizing Workday Learning for Compliance Readiness

+

Context

At Dana-Farber, Workday Learning readiness had to connect configuration, required learning, AEU timing, ownership, support, reporting, and sustainment.

My role

I developed a framework to clarify readiness criteria, go-live blockers, ownership, and decision points before launch.

What I built or shaped

I built a six-phase framework with AEU alignment, owner assignments, testing expectations, go-live support, reporting, and governance.

What it demonstrates

Healthcare learning governance, Workday Learning readiness, compliance sensitivity, and operational accountability.

Capabilities Workday LearningCompliance readinessAEU alignmentLearning governance

Open the PDF to inspect the selected framework or model.

Artifact: Workday Learning Compliance Readiness Framework

PDF

Workday Learning Compliance Readiness Framework

Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · HR Learning · System readiness and AEU alignment

A six-phase framework defining readiness criteria, ownership, AEU criticality, testing expectations, go-live support, and sustainment governance.

What this proves: I can organize complex learning implementation work around ownership, testing, risk, and sustainment.

View PDF

Context

New hire orientation in healthcare has to establish clarity, compliance awareness, belonging, and practical readiness across varied roles.

My role

I considered the learner experience, operational constraints, stakeholder responsibilities, and moments where new employees need structure most.

What I built or shaped

I shaped orientation concepts that connected culture, compliance, logistics, manager support, and follow-through.

What it demonstrates

Onboarding strategy, employee experience design, stakeholder alignment, and workforce readiness.

Capabilities OnboardingWorkforce readinessEmployee experienceStakeholder alignment

Context

Healthcare learning ecosystems involve HR, compliance, operations, clinical partners, research teams, managers, and system owners.

My role

I focus on ownership, decision paths, and governance rhythms so learning work can move without becoming duplicative.

What I built or shaped

I supported governance thinking that links intake clarity, content standards, measurement, stakeholder alignment, and sustainment.

What it demonstrates

Learning governance, cross-functional leadership, operating discipline, and clarity in complex ecosystems.

Capabilities Learning governanceMatrixed leadershipDecision claritySustainment

The sector changes. The operating discipline does not: define the work, prepare the people, support the leaders, and keep improving after launch.

Across every setting, I come back to one question: what do people need to do the work well?

I try to bring the same core discipline to different environments: understand the work, prepare the people, support the leaders, and keep improving after launch.

01Define the work

Name the standard, decision, behavior, or outcome people are preparing for.

02Prepare the people

Build role clarity, practice, resources, and support around the real work.

03Sustain the system

Use feedback, measurement, and governance to keep the learning useful.

Professional Foundation

Credentials, education, and operating range.

This foundation reflects the mix I bring to learning leadership: formal talent development credentials, strategic HR fluency, facilitation capability, graduate education, and experience across very different operating environments.

Credentials

Talent, HR, and facilitation

  • CPTDCertified Professional in Talent Development
  • SHRM-SCPSenior Certified Professional
  • Crucial ConversationsCertified Facilitator

Education

Teaching, business, and quantitative rigor

  • M.A.T.Secondary Education & Teaching
  • MBABusiness leadership foundation
  • Graduate teachingStatistics and calculus

Operating Range

Five environments, one learning discipline

  • Military + GovernmentReadiness, standards, public accountability
  • Higher Education + HealthcareExpert audiences, compliance, mission-driven work
  • Financial ServicesManager capability, member trust, operational consistency

I’m always glad to connect with teams and leaders who care about helping people learn, grow, and do meaningful work well.

Connect

Connect on LinkedIn →
Learning that does not change behavior is not learning. It is content delivery.
The best L&D leaders understand the business before they design the solution.
Complex environments teach discipline, judgment, and respect for the work itself.
The job is not just to build programs. It is to build the conditions for people to perform at their best in the moments that matter most.